Report on the Workshop ‘Varying Fundamental Constants’
http://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2009/358/info.php3?wsid=358
Motivation & Aims
The
deepest enigma of modern physics is whether or not there are any fundamental
scalar fields in nature. Although there are widely accepted theories in
particle physics and cosmology which rely on them, neither side has so far
produced any direct and definitive evidence. On the other hand, Einstein
gravity does not contain any scalar fields. This is a very remarkable fact,
because almost any consistent gravitational theory that one can think of will
have them.
Recent
developments suggest that scalar fields are just as important in cosmology.
Among other roles, they are the preferred explanation for the recently claimed
variations of what have been considered fundamental constants of nature.
Varying fundamental constants directly map the
dynamics of the underlying cosmological scalar fields, and the large redshift lever arm afforded by a range of observational
techniques in astrophysics and cosmology combined with local laboratory
measurements can be used to optimally probe gravity on large and small scales,
as well as providing crucial indirect clues on the presence of extra dimensions
and ultimately string theory itself.
Varying
fundamental constants are part of ESA and ESO science drivers for next
generation of facilities, so closer interactions between theorists,
observational astronomers, cosmologists and atomic physicists will be crucial
for progress in the field. There are controversial claims of a 5-sigma
detection of a smaller value of the fine-structure
constant, and of a 3-sigma detection of a larger value of the
electron-to-proton mass ratio, which are contradicted by analyses of other
groups. Meanwhile laboratory measurements find null results, as do other
astrophysical probes. Given the potential implications, it is important to shed
light on this controversy. Confirmation of these variations would immediately
imply a violation of the Einstein Equivalence Principle, signalling
the breakdown of the concept of gravity as geometry and pointing to
undiscovered gravitational physics.
We
planned the workshop with the aim of bringing together representatives from the
key groups working on this topic, to devise a strategy for a thorough
inter-disciplinary study of varying constants, combining theoretical
expectations and predictions, astrophysical observations (from the ground and
space) and local experiments (mostly with atomic clocks, either in ground
laboratories or in microgravity). A specific goal was the discussion of a
proposal for a European research network on this topic.
The Workshop & Outcomes
There
were a total of 46 registered participants, of which 20 were students or young
post-docs. Given the goals of the meeting, we had a series of review talks in
the mornings (10 in total – one of the scheduled reviewers cancelled at the
last minute and it proved impossible to replace him), while in the afternoons
were split into tutorials for the junior participants and discussion sessions
for the senior participants.
Broadly
speaking the first morning was devoted to particle physics and cosmology
aspects, the second to astrophysical observations (the subject of the ongoing
controversy) and the third to local laboratory measurements. The tutorials
(each lasting a total of 3 hours) also addressed each of these three areas.
The
review talks and tutorials have almost all been recorded, and the audio files
are available on the workshop web-page together with pdf versions of the
presentation slides. The quality of the recordings was very high and we would
like to suggest to the Lorentz Center staff to encourage others to do the same,
since it provides a unique service to the rest of the academic community in The
Netherlands and elsewhere.
The
interaction between researchers and students coming from different areas was
extremely fruitful, and was greaitly aided by the friendly atmosphere of the
Lorentz Center. The workshop allowed the participants to gain a deeper understanding
of the key issues at the forefront of research in this emerging field, as well
as of the strengths and weaknesses of the European community as a whole. This
was crucial for the discussions of future Eruopean-wide activities.
The
main outcome of the workshop was the decision to submit a proposal in reply to
the ESF call for EUROCORES Research Themes. The orgnizational details were
decided during the three days of the workshop, and a significant part of the
proposal was also written there. This proposal has now been submitted, and we
await its outcome in the fall.
Final Remarks
We are
most grateful for the generous finacial support of the Lorentz Center, and
particularly for agreeing to host the workshop at fairly short notice. The fact
that such an ideal venue is available and can organize things very quickly as
an opportunity suddenly arises is one of the great strengths of the Lorentz
Center. The workshop would not have been possible without the help,
constructive suggestions and support of Henriette Jensenius, Martje Kruk and
Corrie Kuster through the various stages of the organization. We look forward
to new developments in this emerging field, and to discussing them again in the
future at the Lorentz Center.
Carlos Martins (CAUP, Porto, Portugal)
Jarle Brinchmann (Leiden Sterrewacht, the
Netherlands)